Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
Trial News
Sneak And Peek Warrants
Legal Issues Regarding Surreptitious Searches
A few courts have upheld the use of sneak and peek warrants, which ensure the lawfulness of surreptitious searches.
Searches and seizures conducted pursuant to validly authorized and executed search warrants are very common law enforcement practices. The canons regulating such searches and seizures at the federal level are found in the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution1 and Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The Fourth Amendment provides the general requirements that all searches and seizures be reasonable and that all warrants be based on sworn probable cause, particularly describing the place to be searched and the items to be seized. Rule 41 imposes more specific regulations regarding the authorization and execution of search warrants, such as authority to issue, authority to serve, time restraints, and notice requirements.
The prescriptions contained in the Fourth Amendment and Rule 41 are well-established and routinely followed by law enforcement officers. There are occasions, however, when a legitimate law enforcement activity does not fit squarely within the realm of a traditional search, and the gov-ernment's ability to comply with conventional constitutional and statutory warrant requirements is questionable. Specifically, the use of "sneak and peek" warrants by law enforcement officers has raised questions regarding compliance with the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and the Rule 41 notice requirement.
Latest news about Attorneys St Louis.com cases in St Louis and nationwide:
NJ Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection, funded by the state's lawyers and judges, awarded $1,179,686... Read more >
Sneak And Peek Warrants Legal Issues Regarding Surreptitious Searches
A few courts have upheld the use of sneak and peek warrants, which ensure th... Read more >
Superior Courts In Washington State
The superior courts in Washington State are the court of general jurisdiction. These courts have exclusive jurisdiction for felony matters, real pr... Read more >
Definition:
The unjustified retention of the possession of lands by one whose original entry was lawful and of right, but whose right to possession has terminated and who refuses to vacate the premises.
Judgment
Definition:
A final determination by a court of the rights of the parties in an action.
If you live in the following cities and need an Trial-Lawyer attorney you should contact
our Trial-Lawyer Attorney as soon as possible:
Arnold
Ballwin
Belton
Blue Springs
Cape Girardeau
Chesterfield
Columbia
Fenton
Florissant
Grandview
Independence
Jefferson City
Joplin
Kansas City
Lebanon
Liberty
O Fallon
Poplar Bluff
Rolla
Saint Charles
Saint Louis
Saint Peters
Sedalia
Sikeston
Springfield
Legal Disclaimers All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Trial Attorneys St Louis.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys
general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access
to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms
and Conditions.
Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep
Did You Know?